LEAVE MESSAGE
Project Case

Case

WESDOM

9 Common Pitfalls in Electromagnetic Flowmeter Selection

2025.04.28

90% of engineers have fallen into these traps!

As a core device in industrial flow measurement, improper selection of an electromagnetic flowmeter can lead to up to 50% in maintenance cost waste.

Pitfall 1: Ignoring the Minimum Conductivity Requirement of the Medium

Misconception

Many users mistakenly believe that electromagnetic flowmeters can measure any liquid, including those with extremely low conductivity (such as pure water, oils, or organic solvents). In fact, electromagnetic flowmeters require the medium to have a minimum conductivity (typically above 5 μS/cm). Ignoring this requirement can result in measurement failure, data distortion, or even device damage.

Underlying Principle

Electromagnetic flowmeters operate based on Faraday’s Law of Electromagnetic Induction: a conductive liquid cutting through magnetic field lines generates an induced electromotive force (proportional to flow velocity), which is detected by electrodes and converted into a flow signal.

Key Points

The strength of the induced signal is directly related to the medium's conductivity.

If the conductivity is too low, the generated signal becomes too weak, easily drowned by circuit noise, resulting in a poor Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and unstable measurements.

Common Issues and Consequences

Large measurement errors or no signal: Electrodes cannot capture effective voltage when conductivity is below the threshold, causing signal fluctuations or loss.

False alarms or device faults: Built-in self-diagnostics may trigger “empty pipe alarms” or misreport “electrode fouling.”

Long-term instability: Low conductivity fluids tend to form insulating layers (e.g., oxide films) on electrode surfaces, further decreasing sensitivity.

Application Recommendations

Confirm medium conductivity: Always test the medium’s conductivity before selection, especially considering temperature effects.

Alternative solutions: Use ultrasonic flowmeters (for pure liquids) or Coriolis mass flowmeters (broader application but higher cost) if conductivity is insufficient.

Special treatments: In low-conductivity liquids, electrolytes (e.g., small amounts of salt) can be added to enhance conductivity without affecting the process.

Industry restrictions: Non-conductive media like petroleum, alcohol, and organic liquids must not use electromagnetic flowmeters.

Case Studies

Case 1: A chemical plant attempted to measure deionized water (2 μS/cm) with an electromagnetic flowmeter, resulting in erratic readings. Switching to an ultrasonic flowmeter resolved the issue.

Case 2: A food factory used an electromagnetic flowmeter for vegetable oil transport; due to the insulating nature of the medium, no signal was generated, eventually burning out the converter circuit.

Pitfall 2: Neglecting Pipe Size and Flow Velocity Matching

Misconception

Many users assume electromagnetic flowmeters can adapt to any pipe size or flow condition, overlooking the critical matching requirements for pipe diameter and flow range.

Common Issues and Consequences

Low flow measurement failure:

Example: DN300 pipe with flow velocity at only 0.1 m/s, using a flowmeter rated for 0.3–10 m/s. The result: no stable output.

Device damage at high flow velocities:

Example: DN50 pipe with flow velocity reaching 15 m/s, causing long-term liner peeling and electrode corrosion.

Flow profile distortion due to size mismatch:

Example: Installing a DN150 flowmeter on a DN200 pipe without proper transitions leads to turbulent flow and significant reading errors (up to ±10%).

Application Recommendations

Strictly match flow velocity range:

General liquids: 0.5–5 m/s

Crystallizing/particle-containing media: ≥1 m/s

Low-velocity optimization models are needed for velocities around 0.1 m/s.

Pipe size adaptation and flow optimization:

Match meter bore with pipeline diameter.

Straight pipe runs: ≥5D upstream, ≥3D downstream (D = pipe diameter).

If necessary to reduce diameter, use gradual reducers (maximum 1.5:1 ratio).

Case Studies

Case 1: A sewage plant installed an electromagnetic flowmeter in a DN400 rainwater pipe; during dry seasons, flow velocity dropped below 0.2 m/s, causing signal loss. Switching to a multi-channel ultrasonic flowmeter solved the problem.

Case 2: A chemical plant transporting concentrated sulfuric acid at 12 m/s using a non-high-speed resistant liner (rubber) experienced liner failure and acid leakage within three months.

Pitfall 3: Ignoring Temperature and Pressure Limits

Industry Reality: Over 80% of liner failures are caused by exceeding temperature or pressure limits.

Liner MaterialMaximum TemperaturePressure ResistanceSuitable Media
PTFE180°C1.6 MPaStrong corrosives
Rubber80°C4.0 MPaNeutral liquids
PFA200°C2.5 MPaFood-grade applications

Emergency Measures: Install heat exchangers or cooling jackets for overheated conditions.

Pitfall 4: Incorrect Installation Location

Fatal Mistake: Insufficient straight pipe runs leading to flow profile distortion.

Installation Guidelines

Upstream straight pipe ≥5D

Downstream straight pipe ≥3D

Never install within 3D downstream of a pump outlet.

Case Study: A hydroelectric station experienced a 7.8% periodic fluctuation due to insufficient installation distance.

Pitfall 5: Mismatch Between Electrode Material and Medium

Chemical Corrosion Impact: Electrode material failure accounts for 27% of faults annually.

Quick Selection Guide

316L Stainless Steel: General acid/base solutions (pH 2–10)

Hastelloy C: Concentrated sulfuric or hydrochloric acids

Titanium Alloy: Seawater, chlor-alkali industries

Tantalum Electrodes: High-temperature concentrated sulfuric acid, hydrofluoric acid

Pitfall 6: Underestimating Empty Pipe and Bubble Interference

Measurement Black Hole: One hour of empty pipe operation can cause electrode damage exceeding $1,500.

Preventive Measures

Equip with standard empty pipe detection (verify output signal type).

For vertical installations, ensure flow direction is bottom-up.

Install automatic air vents at pipeline high points.

Pitfall 7: Electrical Power and Signal Output Confusion

Electrical Trap: Mixing 24VDC and 220VAC supply types causes a 17% early failure rate.

Power SupplyOutput SignalTransmission DistanceSuitable Scenarios
24VDC4-20mA + HART≤500mExplosion-proof zones
220VACPulse + RS485≤100mFixed installations

Pitfall 8: Blindly Pursuing High Accuracy

Cost Trap: 0.2% accuracy devices cost 3–5 times more than 0.5% ones.

Accuracy Selection Formula:

Required Accuracy = (Process Tolerance × 0.6) / Flowmeter Range Ratio

Typical Examples

Municipal water supply: 0.5% is sufficient.

Pharmaceutical ultrapure water: 0.2% is necessary.

Pitfall 9: Neglecting Grounding and Anti-Interference Design

Invisible Killer: Poor grounding accounts for 42% of random errors (Data source: Endress+Hauser report).

Triple Grounding Rules

Connect sensor and pipeline with ≥4mm² copper wire.

Independent grounding with resistance <4Ω.

Avoid sharing grounding points with motors.

12 20, 2021
Water System
12 21, 2021
Power Plant
12 21, 2021
Textile
12 21, 2021
Cement
12 21, 2021
OIL & GAS
12 21, 2021
Sugar Mills
12 21, 2021
Paper & Board
12 21, 2021
Mining
Home Product About Contact